NCREL Policy Issues
Issue 15, January 2004
Policy Recommendations
This policy study highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of the current educational technology policy approaches that are typical of states in the North Central region. Exemplary initiatives are cited that other states could emulate, and policy areas are identified in which many states are strong. The following policy recommendations build on the strengths of the states in the North Central region and address weaknesses that appear to be consistent among these states.
Use technology to achieve policy objectives. States should exploit the potential of computers and telecommunications to aid in achieving policy objectives that may not be directly related to technology. State policymakers may wish to investigate online professional development strategies used in the corporate sector and online assessment approaches as models that could be adapted to their own operations. Federal policymakers could provide funding for initiatives of this type, as well as incentives to business for providing expertise in these areas.
Improve equity. Many states could do more to aid equity through technology—from helping students with special needs, to providing access and services for underserved populations, to facilitating districts' E-Rate applications. States could supplement federal resources through initiatives such as volume-purchasing discounts and money for infrastructure financing. In difficult financial times, equity often becomes a policy area that is downplayed as all local districts experience shortfalls and clamor for state assistance. Staying the course with special initiatives to aid districts with underserved populations is important but requires political will on the part of legislators, governors, and other elected officials.
Integrate technology into the state education plan. Most states do not have an education plan into which educational technology is integrated, thereby not practicing themselves what they preach to local districts. Although the turnover in state education agencies is high, thus making strategic planning difficult, the changeover in elected officials is typically even higher. State policymakers may wish to develop long-range plans that integrate technology into larger educational objectives, then engage in active educational outreach to legislators and governors.
Provide oversight of district technology plans. State oversight of district technology plans is an important policy tool for increasing the effectiveness of investments in computers and telecommunications. As a follow-up activity, states could do more to share exemplary district plans that seem good models for others to follow.
