Skip over navigation
Learning Point Associates
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory
NCREL HomeSite Map
Photographs of Teachers. Photos by Steven E. Gross and Associates.
Teacher Quality Home
Certification
Retention and Recruitment
Professional Development
Mobility
Quality
TQ Source Web Site

References

American Federation of Teachers. (1995). Professional development guidelines. Washington, DC: Author.

BEST: The best teachers for Ohio's children. (1997). Columbus: Ohio Department of Education.

Bull, B. (1999, February). Panel on professional development from case-study states. Paper presented at the REPR Consortium Meeting & Professional Development Funding Study Panel Meeting, sponsored by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Bloomington, IN.

Bull, B., & Buechler, M. (1998). Planning together: Professional development for teacher of ALL students. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Education Policy Center.(Available through Education Forum, Indiana University.)

Bull, B., & Buechler, M. (1996). Learning together: Professional development for better schools. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Education Policy Center. (Available through the Association for Supervisions and Curriculum Development.)

Bull, B., Buechler, M., Didley, S., & Krehbiel, L. (1994). Professional development and teacher time: Principles, guidelines, and policy options for Indiana. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Education Policy Center.

Choy, S. P., & Ross, M. (1998). Toward better teaching: Professional development in 1993-94 (NCES No. 98-230). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.

Cody, C. B., & Guskey, T. R. (1997). Professional development. In J. C. Lindle, J. Petroski, & R. Pankratz (Eds.), 1996 review of research on the Kentucky Educational Reform Act (pp. 191-210). Frankfurt, KY: The Kentucky Institute on Educational Research.

Education Commission of the States. (1997). Investing in teacher professional development: A look at 16 school districts. Denver: Education Commission of the States.

The Finance Project. (1998). Financing professional development in education: Round table discussion. Washington, DC: Author.

Finn, C. E. (1990). The biggest reform of all. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(8), 584-92.

First, P. F., Crucio, J. L., & Young, D. (1994). State full-service intiatives' new notions of policy development. In L. Adler & S. Gardner (Eds.), The politics of linking school and social services (pp. 63-73). Washington, DC: Folmer.

Guskey, T. R., & Sparks, D. (1997). Exploring the relationship between staff development and improvement in learning. Journal of Staff Development 17(4), 34- 38.

Indiana Advisory Council for the National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (1999). The conditions of teaching and learning in Indiana. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Joyce, B., Calhoun, E., Carren, & Halliburton (1994, March). Exploring staff development theories: The Ames study. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Chicago, IL. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 369 751)

Massell, D., & Fuhrman, S. (1994). Ten years of state education reform, 1983- 93. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE Research Reports Series RR-028).

Miller, B., Lord, B., & Dorney, J. (1994). Staff development for teachers: A study of configurations and costs in four districts. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.

Nussbaum, L. C. (1999, February). Panel on professional development from case-study states. Paper presented at the REPR Consortium Meeting & Professional Development Funding Study Panel Meeting, sponsored by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Bloomington, IN.

Ohio Department of Education (n.d.). Ohio's professional development system, Part 1. Columbus: Author.

Ohio NCTAF Task Force, (1997). The best teachers for Ohio in partnership with the National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. Columbus, OH: BEST.

Petrosko, J. A. (1997). Assessment and accountability. In J. C. Lindley, J. Petrosko, & R. Pankratz (Eds.), 1996 review of research on the Kentucky Education Reform Act. Frankfurt, KY: Kentucky Institute for Education Research.

St. John, E. P., & Bardzell, J. S. (1999). Improving early literacy: Criteria for success. Policy News & Notes 9(1), 1, 3, 8. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Education Policy Center.

St. John, E., Bardzell, J. S., Michael, R., Hall, G., Manoil, K., Asker, E., & Clements, M. (1998). Indiana's early literacy intervention grant program implementation study. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Education Policy Center.

Shulman, L. S., & Sykes, G. (1983). Handbook of teaching and policy. New York: Longman.

Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Sykes, G. (1983). Public policy and the problem of teacher quality: The need for screens and magnets. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 97-125). New York: Longman.

Sykes, G. (1979). Government intervention in the school curriculum: Floating like a bee, stinging like a butterfly. In J. Schaffarzick & G. Sykes (Eds.) Value conflicts and curriculum issues: Issues from research and experience (pp. 313-330). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Building bridges: The mission and principles of professional development. Washington, DC: Author.

Usher, P. L. (1999, February). Panel on professional development from case-study states. Paper presented at the REPR Consortium Meeting & Professional Development Funding Study Panel Meeting, sponsored by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Bloomington, IN.

Ward, J. G., St. John, E. P., & Laine, S. (1999). State programs for teacher professional development. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Next | Previous | Contents


Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Copyright © Learning Point Associates.
All rights reserved.
Disclaimer and copyright information.