Skip over navigation
Visit the NCREL Home Page


References


Pathways Home

Alberts, B. (1997, June 10). Remarks by Bruce Alberts, president, NationalAcademy of Sciences, at news conference to release fourth-grade findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/s06101997?OpenDocument

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/bolintro.htm

Associated Press. (2004, December 14). U.S. registers slight gains in science, math: Eighth-graders improve, but fourth-graders stall in global survey. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6711414/print/1/displaymode/1098

Barchfeld-Venet, P. (2005). Formative assessment: The basics. Alliance Access, 9(1), 2-3.

Bybee, R. W., & Kennedy, D. (2005). Math and science achievement. Science, 307(28), 481.

Champagne, A. (with Sherwood, S., & Cezikturk, O.) (n.d.). Bringing the science assessment standards into the classroom. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://cela.albany.edu/publication/article/science.htm

Coble, C., & Allen, M. (2005). Keeping America competitive: Five strategies to improve mathematics and science education. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/62/19/6219.pdf

Corcoran, T. (2003). The Merck Institute for Science Education: A successful intermediary for education reform (CPRE Research Report Series RR-052). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/rr52.pdf

Corcoran, T., & Lawrence, N. (2003). Changing district culture and capacity: The impact of the Merck Institute for Science Education Partnership (CPRE Research Report Series RR-054). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/rr54.pdf

Corcoran, T., McVay, S., & Riordan, K. (2003). Getting it right: The MISE approach to professional development (CPRE Research Report Series RR-055). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/rr55.pdf

Eisenhower National Clearinghouse. (2004). Looking into a standards-based curriculum. ENC Focus, 12(5).

Feller, B. (2004, July 5). Teachers concerned for science education. The Boston Globe. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2020/07/05/teachers_concerned_for_science_education/

Gibbon, P. (2005, January 4). No teacher left behind. National Review. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.nationalreview.com/script/printpage.p?ref=/comment/gibbon200501040730.asp

Goals 2000: Educate America Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-227, 108 Stat. 125 (1994). Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/GOALS2000/TheAct/index.html

Gonzales, P., Guzman, J. C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., et al. (2004). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005-005). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005005.pdf

Hambrick, A., & Svedkauskaite, A. (2005). Remembering the child: On equity and inclusion in mathematics and science classrooms (Pathways Critical Issue). Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/math/ma800.htm

Hollweg, K. S., & Hill, D. (Eds.). (2003). What is the influence of the national science education standards? Reviewing the evidence: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.nap.edu/books/0309087430/html/

Krueger, A., & Sutton, J. (Eds.). (2001). EDThoughts: What we know about science teaching and learning. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

Lesson Study Research Group. (n.d.). Lesson study groups. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.tc.edu/lessonstudy/lsgroups.html

Ligon, G. D. (2004, March). A technology framework to support accountability and assessment: How states can evaluate their status for No Child Left Behind. Presentation given at "Empowering Accountability and Assessment Using Technology" Summit, St. Louis, MO. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.nclbtechsummits.org/summit1/GlynnLigonWhitePaper.pdf

Loucks-Horsley, S. (n.d.). Effective professional development for teachers of science. In Ideas that work: Science professional development. Columbus, OH: Eisenhower National Clearinghouse. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.enc.org/professional/learn/ideas/science/document.shtm?input=ACQ-142559-2559_2,00.shtm

Loucks-Horsley, S, Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: CA: Corwin Press.

Mathematics and Science Education Expert Panel. (2001). Exemplary and promising science programs. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/ORAD/KAD/expert_panel/math-science.html

McAninch, A. R. (1993). Teacher thinking and the case method: Theory and future directions . New York: Teachers College Press.

McLaughlin, M., & Yocom, D. J. (2005). Japanese method gets a Wyoming accent: Lab school in Laramie adapts lesson study concept to its own needs. Journal of Staff Development, 26(1), 53-56 .

National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Comparing NAEP, TIMSS and PISA results in mathematics and science . Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/pdf/naep_timss_pisa_comp.pdf

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html

National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it's too late: A report to the nation from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/report.pdf

National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

National Education Goals Panel. (1991). The national education goals report: Building a nation of learners, 1991. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

National Education Goals Panel. (1999). The national education goals report: Building a nation of learners, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/negp/reports/99rpt.pdf

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.nap.edu/books/0309053269/html/index.html

National Science Foundation. (2004, December 14). International study shows select improvements in U.S. math and science performance—Gains also seen among some minority students [Press release]. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=100594&org=NSF&from=news

National Science Teachers Association. (1998). NSTA position statement: National science education standards. Arlington, VA. Author. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.nsta.org/positionstatement&psid=24&print=y

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002). Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/

New Jersey Department of Education. (1998). Implementing a standards-based science curriculum. In New Jersey science curriculum framework (pp. 34-38). Trenton, NJ: Author. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.state.nj.us/njded/frameworks/science/chap3.pdf

Ohio Department of Education. (n.d.). Standards-based education. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://ims.ode.state.oh.us/ODE/IMS/SBE/default.asp

Project 2061 & National Science Teachers Association. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Resnick, L., & Nolan, K. (1995). Where in the world are world-class standards? Educational Leadership, 52(6), 6-10. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ed.psu.edu/insys/ESD/standards/resnick.html

Riordan, K. (2003). Teacher leadership as a strategy for instructional improvement: The case of the Merck Institute for Science Education (CPRE Research Report Series RR-053). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/rr53.pdf

Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans . New York: Oxford University Press.

Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.

Schmidt, W. H. (2003, February 6). International perspective. Presentation made at the Secretary's Summit on Mathematics, Washington, DC. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mathscience/schmidt.html

Stanovich, P. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular instructional decisions. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/pdf/Stanovich_Color.pdf

Texley, J. (n.d.). Implementing the national science standards. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://go.hrw.com/resources/go_sc/gen/HSTPR116.PDF

Toppo, G. (2004, December 14). U.S. 8th-graders gain in math, science; 4th-graders weak. USA Today . Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://usatoday.com/news/education/2020-12-14-student-scores_x.htm

Tugel, J. (2004). Time for science. Alliance Access, 8(2), 1-3.

U.S. Department of Education. (2003). No child left behind: A parents guide. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ed.gov/parents/academic/involve/nclbguide/parentsguide.pdf

U.S. Department of Education. (2004a, March 16). No Child Left Behind, standards, and bridging formal/informal science learning opportunities . Panel 3 discussion at the Secretary's Summit on Science, Washington, DC.

U.S. Department of Education. (2004b, March 16). Professional development and innovative tools for learning science . Panel 2 discussion at the Secretary's Summit on Science, Washington, DC.

U.S. Department of Education (2005). Helping your child learn science . Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from http://www.ed.gov/parents/academic/help/science/science.pdf

Weiss, I. R., Knapp, M. S., Hollweg, K. S., & Burrill, G. (Eds.). (2001). Investigating the influence of standards: A framework for research in mathematics, science, and technology education. Washington , DC : National Academy Press. Retrieved August 22, 2020 , from http://www.nap.edu/books/030907276X/html/

Return to " Science Education in the Era of No Child Left Behind—History, Benchmarks, and Standards."

Get Adobe Reader

Adobe Reader FAQ

info@ncrel.org
Copyright © North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer and copyright information.