"Most preservice students are excited and yet overwhelmed by the
thought of teaching differently than they have been taught. It is difficult
for them to perceive alternatives, because this requires consideration
of teaching approaches that are unfamiliar, and redefinition of the essence
of teaching." (p. 385) In some cases, the influence of experience with traditional methodologies
may prove so strong as to cause the outright rejection of alternate pedagogies
(Holt-Reynolds, 1992). To break the cycle of factory-model instruction being passed from one
generation to the next, intervention must take place. That intervention
takes the form of the instruction experienced by preservice students in
their teacher education coursework. Preservice students who are engaged
in cooperative learning,
peer tutoring, heterogeneous
grouping, simulations, and other instructional
strategies in their teacher education coursework are more likely to use
those strategies in their future classrooms. In effect, teacher educators
must model the effective teaching that they expect their students eventually
to deliver. Teacher educators should practice what they preach. When teaching about
cooperative learning, for example, they should engage preservice students
in activities that make use of cooperative learning. When promoting instruction
for critical thinking, they should ask questions involving high-level thinking.
To encourage professional habits of mind that value variability and reflection,
instructors should focus students' conscious attention on follow-up questions
after each classroom activity. Questions such as the following would be
appropriate: The instruction experienced by preservice students should be intellectually
challenging. Just as prospective teachers should possess high
expectations for all students (e.g., Zeichner, 1993), so should teacher
educators entertain high expectations for their students.. Further,
teacher educators should not shy away from challenging preservice students'
preconceptions related to equity and multicultural
education. Finally, teacher education coursework should include the affective domain
as well as the cognitive, and it should take place within a socially supportive
context. The affective dimensions
of learning include feelings, emotions, and self-esteem. Caine and
Caine (1991) note that students learn best in an emotional climate that
is supportive and marked by mutual respect. Zeichner (1993) identifies
the ability to form emotional bonds with students as a crucial trait of
successful teachers of diverse groups of learners. Teacher educators, likewise,
should seek to relate to their students not only intellectually but also
affectively. When issues pertinent to multicultural education enter the
teacher education curriculum, the affective domain naturally and necessarily
becomes engaged. That the expression of emotions should occur in a socially supportive
environment--in which everyone has the opportunity to speak and diverse
views are treated with respect--seems obvious. However, the social context
of discourse related to multiculturalism has added significance. In class
discussions, preservice students may experience disequilibrium,
which is a catalyst for conceptual change. In responding to classmates'
views, they may struggle to articulate their own views to others--and,
more important, to themselves (Shaw, 1994). Additional Reading for Element 12

Educating Teachers for Diversity:
Element 12
![]()
ELEMENT STATEMENT:
Preservice instruction is embedded in a group setting that provides
both intellectual challenge and social support.
THE BIG
PICTURE: Because prospective teachers tend to teach as they have been
taught, their experiences as students often program their practices as
teachers. They may be reluctant to try teaching strategies that they themselves
have not experienced. Boyle-Baise and Sleeter (1996) note:
GOALS:
IMPLICATIONS
FOR ACTION: In their coursework, preservice students should be engaged
in instruction that is characterized by variability. That is, it should
appeal to a wide variety of learning styles.
OBSTACLES
TO ACTION: Some teacher educators may not demonstrate innovative teaching
strategies or be models for effective teaching. According to Katz and Raths
(1982), teacher educators often are guilty of not practicing what they
preach.
Copyright © North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer and copyright information.