

Create a clear and focused accountability system.

A clear and focused accountability system needs to be created in
order for
decentralized, high-involvement management to work - to educate all
students to high educational standards. Four elements are critical
for
such an accuntability system:
- A clear and measurable set of educational goals for all
schools in
the system. The goals should center on student achievement in
core
curriculum content areas: language arts, mathematics, science,
history,
and social studies. These areas also could include foreign language
and
the visual and performing arts. The goals should specify that the
system
expects all students to perform at high levels in these
content
areas.
- A set of measures that indicate the current status of student
performance with respect to goals and changes over time. Without
clear and specific measures, goals are relatively useless for an
accountability system. The types of new student assessment in
California,
Kentucky, and Connecticut and those being developed by the New
Standards
Project represent the kinds of student achievement measures that are
needed. They indicate both what a student knows and what a student
can do
with that knowledge to solve problems, analyze issues, or communicate
effectively.
- A reporting system that periodically informs the public, the
school
system, parents, and students of school performance. Student
academic
achievement and changes in that achievement, disaggregated by income,
gender, and student ability, should be the cornerstone of the
reporting
system. Other information also should be reported, including the
results
of periodic surveys of parent and community satisfaction with the
local
school.
- A set of both rewards and sanctions - i.e., consequences tied
to
results. A results-driven system can succeed only if
consequences are
tied to changes in system performance over time. Rewards and
sanctions
should be based on changes in schoolwide performance over time; the
goal
is to improve the system, not to reward or sanction it for either
high or
low starting conditions. Group-based performance rewards could be
part of
teacher compensation; they also could be outside of compensation per
se -
e.g., providing additional opportunities for teachers to engage in
professional development activities (including travel and expenses
for
attending professional conferences) and grants for school improvement
activities. Sanctions could include phasing in technical assistance
and -
as a last resort - takeover.
info@ncrel.org
Copyright © North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer and copyright information.