
Charter schools are the newest approach designed to put flexibility into the system.
Since Minnesota enacted the first charter school law in 1991, other
states
have approved a version of the idea. California passed the
legislation in
1992; Colorado, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Mexico, and Wisconsin did
so
in 1993; and Michigan, Kansas, and Hawaii passed legislation in 1994.
(Missouri passed legislation allowing three pilots, but because of
their
pilot status, Missouri is not counted here.)
As of July 1994, at least 96 individual
charter schools
Charter schools run independently of local school districts and are designed to exist outside of most rules and regulations. A charter is essentially a contract, negotiated between those starting the school and the official body in the state empowered to approve the charter. This contract spells out how the school will be run, what will be taught, how success will be measured, and what outcomes will be achieved by the students attending the school. As long as the school meets the terms of its charter, it is free from many of the rules and regulations under which most schools must operate. (Note that some cities - Philadelphia and New York, for example - have called their magnet schools charters. The focus of this discussion is not on magnet schools, but on state-empowered programs.)
A charter is written by a team of individuals interested in establishing the new school. Charters have been granted to parents, teachers, and community organizations. The entity that approves a charter varies from state to state. In some states, the state superintendent approves charters; in other states, the local school board approves charters; and in still other states, such as Michigan, many institutions can approve charters, including institutions of higher education. The school then receives per-pupil funding at or near the level of funding a student in that district would have received in a traditional school. Charter schools:
Questions to Consider
Policymakers or those writing charters should consider the following questions:
Charter schools can generate broad political backing. In some states, they have been approved after voucher initiatives failed - appearing to operate as a compromise that strengthens people's choices among schools, while ensuring that resources and students go to public schools. Charter schools effectively empower teachers and parents who are not satisfied with current schools for a variety of reasons.
Charter schools also are intended to encourage innovation and experimentation in education systems that need competition to drive wider reform; however, preliminary data on the types of schools approved suggests that the bold innovations that were expected generally have not materialized.

See also NCREL's Policy Briefs "Charter Schools Update." or
"Charter Schools: A New Breed of Public Schools."