References

Anderson, R.H. (1992, April). The nongraded elementary school: Lessons from history. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 161)

Anderson, R.H., & Pavan, B.N. (1993). Nongradedness: Helping it to happen. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.

American Association of School Administrators. (1992). The nongraded primary: Making schools fit children. Arlington, VA: Author.

Barker, S. (n.d.). Multiage grouping: An old practice becomes a new trend [Online]. Available: http://www.ocmboces.org/OCM/administration/info/ep1/update1pg/upd2.html

Bredekamp, S. (Ed). (1990). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (Exp. ed). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J.S., & Haste, H. (Ed.). (1987). Making sense: The child's construction of the world. New York: Methuen.

Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Calkins, T. (1993). Off the track: Children thrive in ungraded primary schools. In D. Sumner (Ed.), Multiage classrooms: The ungrading of America's schools (pp. 26-30). Peterborough, NH: Society for Developmental Education

Clark, A. (1996, Fall/Winter). Special-needs children and mixed-age grouping. TheMAGnet Newsletter on Mixed-Age Grouping in Preschool and Elementary Settings, 5(1).

Cohen, D. (1990). A look at multiage classrooms. Education Week, 9, 13-15.

Cotton, K. (1993a, November). Implementing a nongraded elementary program [Online]. Available: http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/8/s029.html

Cotton, K. (1993b). Nongraded primary education [Online]. Available: http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/7/cu14.html

Cushman, K. (1993). The whys and hows of the multiage primary classroom. In D. Sumner (Ed.), Multiage classrooms: The ungrading of America's schools (pp. 20-25). Peterborough, NH: Society for Developmental Education.

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Education Office. (1996). Handbook of engaged learning projects [Online]. Available: http://www.ncrel.org/mands/FERMI/cover.html

Fox, C.L. (1996a, February). Multiage program proposal. In School program study guide: The multiage classroom. Unpublished guide developed for the Michigan Department of Education.

Fox, C.L. (1996b, February). Self-study instrument for schools. In Developing a plan of action: The multiage classroom. Unpublished guide developed for the Michigan Department of Education.

Fox, C.L. (1997). The multiage nongraded model. Unpublished presentation materials.

Gardner, A., & Johnson, D. (1997). Teaching personal experience narrative in the elementary and beyond. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona Writing Project Press.

Gaustad, J. (1992, August). Nongraded primary education. ERIC Digest [Online]. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED347637

Gaustad, J. (1995, May). Implementing the multiage classroom. ERIC Digest [Online]. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED381869

Gaustad, J. (1997, June). Building support for multiage education. ERIC Digest [Online]. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED409604

Goodlad, J.I., & Anderson, R.H. (1987). The nongraded elementary school (Rev. ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Grant, J. (1993). Questions and answers about multiage programs. In D. Sumner (Ed.), Multiage classrooms: The ungrading of America's schools (pp. 17-19). Peterborough, NH: Society for Developmental Education.

Gutierrez, R., & Slavin, R. (1992). Achievement effects of the nongraded elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 62, 333-376.

Johnson, D., & Newman, S. (1996). Student dispositions. Unpublished material.

Jones, M.B. (1996). Smoothing rough edges in Concrete [Online]. Available: http://www.nwrel.org/nwedu/winter%5F96/article5.html

Katz, L.G. (1988). Early childhood education: What research tells us. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

Katz, L.G. (1992). Nongraded and mixed-age grouping in early childhood programs. ERIC Digest [Online]. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED351148

Katz, L.G. (1993). Dispositions as educational goals. ERIC Digest [Online]. Available: http://www.ericfacility.net/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed363454.html

Katz, L.G. (1995, May). The benefits of mixed-age grouping. ERIC Digest [Online]. Available: http://www.ericfacility.net/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed382411.html

Katz, L.G. (1996, Fall/Winter). Addressing the potential risks of mixed-age grouping. TheMAGnet Newsletter on Mixed-Age Grouping in Preschool and Elementary Settings, 5(1).

Katz, L.G., Evangelou, D., & Hartman, J. (1990). The case for mixed-age grouping in early education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Kentucky Department of Education. (1996, June). Learning descriptions and research on children's learning and development: A component of the Kentucky Elementary Learning Profile (KELP). Frankfort, KY: Author.

Lincoln School. (1997, Spring). Lincoln news. Mundelein, Illinois: Author.

Lodish, R. (1992). The pros and cons of mixed-age grouping. Early Childhood Education, 71, 20-22.

Luchow, L., Miller, J., & Yates, R. (1998). Chimacum intermediate multiage program [Online]. Available: http://www.chimacum.wednet.edu/elementary/imap/

Mackey, B., Johnson, R., & Wood, T. (1995). Cognitive and affective outcomes in a multiage language arts program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 10, 49-61.

Mazzuchi, D., & Brooks, N. (1993). The gift of time. In D. Sumner (Ed.), Multiage classrooms: The ungrading of America's schools (pp. 39-41). Peterborough, NH: Society for Developmental Education.

McClellan, D.E. (Ed.). (1993, Fall/Winter). Thinking about Piaget in relationship to the mixed-age classroom. TheMAGnet Newsletter on Mixed-Age Grouping in Preschool and Elementary Settings, 2(1), 1-2.

McClellan, D.E. (1994). Multiage grouping: Implications for education. In P. Chase & J. Doan (Eds.), Full circle: A new look at multiage education (pp. 147-166). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

McClellan, D.E. (Ed.). (1995, Fall/Winter). Looping though the years: Teachers and students progressing together. The MAGnet Newsletter on Mixed-Age Grouping in Preschool and Elementary Settings, 4(1), 1-3.

McClellan, D.E. (Ed.). (1996, Spring/Summer). Mixed-age grouping: Lifeline to children at risk? The MAGnet Newsletter on Mixed-Age Grouping in Preschool and Elementary Settings, 4(2).

McClellan, D.E. (1997, Spring/Summer). Addressing the risk of bullying in mixed-age groups. The MAGnet Newsletter on Mixed-Age Grouping in Preschool and Elementary Settings, 5(2).

McClellan, D., & Kinsey, S. (1996, Fall/Winter). Mixed-age grouping helps children develop social skills and a sense of belonging. The MAGnet Newsletter on Mixed-Age Grouping in Preschool and Elementary Settings, 5(1), 1-3.

McLoughlin, W. (1969). Evaluation of the nongraded primary. Jamaica, NY: St. John's University.

Miller, B.A. (1993). A review of the quantitative research on multigrade instruction. In D. Sumner (Ed.), Multiage classrooms: The ungrading of America's schools (pp. 65-83). Peterborough, NH: Society for Developmental Education.

Miller, B.A. (1996, January). A basic understanding of multiage grouping: Teacher readiness, planning, and parent involvement required for successful practice. The School Administrator, 1(53), 12-17.

Miller, W. (1995, February). Are multiage grouping practices a missing link in the educational reform debate? National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) Bulletin, 27-32.

National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1996). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (NAEYC position statement) [Online]. Available: http://www.naeyc.org/resources/position_statements/daptoc.htm

National Middle School Association. (1996). Exemplary middle schools. NMSA research summary #4 (Online). Available: http://www.nmsa.org/research/ressum4.htm

Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory. (1997). Looping: Supporting student learning through long-term relationships [Online]. Available: http://www.alliance.brown.edu/pubs/ic/looping/looping.pdf

Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (1998). Toolkit '98 [Online]. Available: http://www.nwrel.org/assessment/ToolKit98.asp

Nye, B. (1993, Summer). Questions and answers about multiage grouping. Educational Research Service (ERS) Spectrum, 38-45.

Pratt, D. (1993). On the merits of multiage classrooms. In D. Sumner (Ed.), Multiage classrooms: The ungrading of America's schools (pp. 83-87). Peterborough, NH: Society for Developmental Education.

Privett, N. (1996, January). Without fear of failure: The attributes of an ungraded primary school. The School Administrator, 1(53), 6-11.

Shepard, L., & Smith, M. (1990). Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention. Educational Leadership, 47, 84-88.

Stone, S. (1995). The primary multiage classroom: Changing schools for children. Unpublished manuscript.

Tompkins, G. (1990). Teaching and writing: Balancing process and product. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.

Uphoff, J.K, & Evans, D.A. (1993). The country school comes to town: A case study of multiage grouping and teaching. In D. Sumner (Ed.), Multiage classrooms: The ungrading of America's schools (pp. 36-38). Peterborough, NH: Society for Developmental Education.

Villa, R.A., & Thousand, J.S. (1993). Enhancing success in heterogeneous classrooms and schools: The powers of partnership. In D. Sumner (Ed.), Multiage classrooms: The ungrading of America's schools (pp. 51-61). Peterborough, NH: Society for Developmental Education.

Willis, S. (1991). Breaking down grade barriers. Update, p. 4.