Skip over navigation
Visit the NCREL Home Page

  References


Pathways Home

Ahmed-Ullah, N. S. (2002, April 2). For kids, if it's Tuesday, is it English or Japanese? Chicago Tribune, pp. 1, 9.

Anglin, G. J. (Ed.). (1991). Instructional technology: Past, present, and future. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

Bermudez, A. B., & Palumbo, D. (1994). Bridging the gap between literacy and technology: Hypermedia as a learning tool for limited English proficient students. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 14, 165-184.

Bishop, A. (2000). Technology trends and their potential for bilingual education. In P. A. DiCerbo (Ed.), Issue and Brief, 7. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Bishop, A. (2001). An expert's guide to products for the multilingual classroom. Technology and Learning, 21(9), 39-46.

Burgess, Y., & Trinidad, S. (1997). Young children and computers: Debating the issues. Australian Educational Computing, 12(1), 16-21.

Collins, T. (2002, Spring). Teaching low-level adult ESL learners the language of technology. Illinois TESOL•BE Newsletter.

Consortium for School Networking (CoSN). (n.d.). TCO checklist: Retrofitting. Taking TCO to the classroom. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://www.classroomtco.org/checklist/retrofitting.html.

Crandall, J., Jaramillo, A., Olsen, L., & Peyton, J. K. (2002). Using cognitive strategies to develop English language and literacy. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://www.cal.org/ericcll/digest/0205crandall.html.

Dirksen Elementary School, School District 54, Schaumburg, Illinois. (2003). Multiage instruction at Dirksen: A brief overview. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://web54.sd54.k12.il.us/schools/dirksen/aboutdirksen.htm#Multiage%20Instruction.

Durán, R., & Durán, J. (n.d.). Developing immigrant parents' computer learning in partnership with students' learning. Project 3.4. CREDE, UC Santa Barbara. [Online] http://www.crede.ucsc.edu/research/sfc/intro3_4.html

Ficklen, E., & Muscara, C. (2001, Fall). Harnessing technology in the classroom. American Educator, 22-29.

García, C. E. (1999). Using animation software to assist second language learners in science learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Green, T. D., & Peerless, J. I. (2001). Digital Me Books: ESL students in Grades 3-4 create autobiographies using HyperStudio. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(2), 32-35, 56.

Greene, P. J. (1998). Follow that mouse! Using just the Internet to teach high school biology. Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(7), 21-26.

George Washington University, Center for Equity and Excellence in Education. (1996). Promoting excellence: Ensuring academic success for limited English proficient students. (Guiding principles resource guide). Washington DC: Author.

Hall, R. L., & Schaverien, L. (2001). Families' engagement with young children's science and technology learning at home. L. D. Dierking and J. H. Falk (Section Eds.). Science Education, 85(4), 454-481.

Hanson-Smith, E. (1997). Technology in the classroom: Practice and promise in the 21st century. TESOL Professional Papers #4. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://www.tesol.org/pubs/catalog/downloadable/hanson-smith-2.html

Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22-26.

Hoven, D. (1992). CALL in a language learning environment. CAELL Journal, 3(2), 19-27.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology standards for students: Connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR: Author. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://cnets.iste.org/students/s_book.html

Illinois State Board of Education. (2002). Schaumburg School District 54. 2002 Illinois District Report Card. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://206.166.105.128/ReportCard/asps/rclist.asp?ID=140160540&fy=2002&srch=dst

Johns, K. M., & Tórrez, N. M. (2001). Helping ESL learners succeed. Phi Delta Kappa, 484, 7-49.

Jones, B. F., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1995). Plugging in: Choosing and using educational technology. NEKIA Communications: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Kasper, L. F. (2000). The Role of Information Technology in the Future of Content-Based ESL Instruction. In L. F. Kasper, D. M. Brinton, J. W. Rosenthal, P. Mastera, S.Myers, J. Egbert, et al. (Eds.), Content-based college ESL instruction (pp. 202-12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Krashen, S. D. (1994). Bilingual education and second language acquisition theory. In C. F. Leyba (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (2nd Ed.) (pp. 47-75). Los Angeles, CA: California State Department of Education.

Krueger, E. (1998). Media literacy does work, trust me. English Journal, 17-20.

Labov, W., & Baker, B. (2001, November). Testing the effectiveness of an individualized reading program for African-American, Euro-American and Latino inner city children. Paper presented for a meeting of the Interagency Educational Research Initiative Directors, Washington, DC. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/UMRP/UMRP.html

LaCelle-Peterson, M. W., & Rivera, C. (1994). Is it real for all kids? A framework for equitable assessment policies for English language learners. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 55-75.

Lee, K. (2000). English teachers' barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(12). [Online] http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html

Mehlinger, H. D. (1995). School reform in the information age. Bloomington, IN: Center for Excellence in Education.

Murray, G., & Kouritzin, S. (1997). Re-thinking second language instruction, autonomy and technology: A manifesto. System, 25(2), 185-96.

National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs. (2002). The growing numbers of limited English proficient students: 1991-92/2001-02. Poster. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/policy/states/stateposter.pdf

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002). Retrieved June 20, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/

North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (n.d.). Indicator: Range of use. enGauge Web site. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/framewk/efp/range/efpranin.htm

Northwest Educational Technology Consortium (NETC). (2002) Early connections: Technology in early childhood education: Health & safety. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://www.netc.org/earlyconnections/kindergarten/health.html

Padrón, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (1996). Improving the teaching and learning of English language learners through instructional technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23(4), 341-354.

Pease-Alvarez, L. (1993). Moving in and out of bilingualism: Investigating native language maintenance and shift in Mexican-descent children. Research report No. 6. Santa Cruz, CA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. [Online] http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/ncrcdsll/rr6/

Rauch, L. (1999). School District 54: Information and communication technologies plan. Retrieved May 5, 2003, from http://www.sd54.k12.il.us/instruct/learning/techplan.pdf

Reilly, R. (2002). Resources for decision-making in a digital age. Multimedia Schools, 9(1), 70-72.

Romaine, S. (1995). Some consequences of assessment procedures for bilingual children. In S. Romaine, Bilingualism (2nd ed.) (pp. 273-81). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.

Short, D. J. (2000a). The ESL standards: Bridging the academic gap for English language learners. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, ED 447728. Retrieved May 5, 2003, from http://www.ericfacility.net/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed447728.html

Short, D. J. (2000b, November). What principals should know about sheltered instruction for English language learners. NAASP Bulletin, 84(619), 17-27.

Smith, M. M. (1995). The battle over bilingual education. Electronic Learning, 15(1), 30-38.

Taylor, R. (1999). Missing pieces: Aligned curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Schools in the Middle, 9(4), 14-16.

Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. (1997). ESL standards for pre-K-12 students. Alexandria, VA: Author.

Technology counts 2001: The new divides: Looking beneath the numbers to reveal digital inequities. (2001). Education Week. 20(35).

Texas Education Agency. (2002). 2002 accountability manual: The 2002 accountability rating system for Texas Public Schools and school districts. Retrieved June 20, 2003, http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2002/manual/

Tiene D., & Luft, P. (2002). Classroom dynamics in a technology-rich learning environment. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(4), 10-13.

Tobiason, T. L. (1996, October). We are the future! Learning and Leading with Technology, 24(2),18-20.

Tornatzky, L. G., Macias, E. E., & Jones, S. (2002). Latinos and information technology: The promise and the challenge. Claremont, CA: The Tómas Rivera Policy Institute.

Valdez, G., Svedkauskaite, A., & McNabb, M. (2002). Mastering the mosaic: Framing impact factors to aid limited English proficient students in mathematics and science. Pathways to School Improvement critical issue. Retrieved May 5, 2003, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/math/ma700.htm

info@ncrel.org
Copyright © North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer and copyright information.