Critical
Issue:
ISSUE: Too many students leave high school without the occupational
and academic skills to succeed in the workplace or in postsecondary education.
School-to-work transition initiatives offer a promising approach to this
issue and require major school restructuring.
OVERVIEW: A report by the Commission on the Skills of the American
Workforce, America's Choice: High Skills or Low Wages! (1990), states
that "America may have the worst school-to-work transition system
of any advanced industrial country." (p. 4) The curriculum of the
typical American high school is geared toward preparing students for four-year
colleges and universities.
Lynn Peters, director of Business-Education Partnerships for the Fox Cities
Chamber of Commerce and Industry, discusses how high schools in Wisconsin
often direct most of their efforts toward the 25 percent of kids who graduate
from college. Excerpted from NCREL's Rural Audio Journal,
Vol. 2, No. 3, From School to Work - and Back Again: Youth Apprenticeships
in Wisconsin (NCREL, 1994) (Audio comment, 315k). A text version is available.
Yet only about 50 percent of graduating seniors enroll in postsecondary education, and only half of them attain bachelor's degrees. Students who do not plan to pursue a four-year degree after graduation often are placed in a "general track" - which leads nowhere - and expectations for their academic achievement tend to be low. Although many excellent high school occupational programs exist, the U.S. Department of Education (1994) reports that enrollments in vocational programs are declining, as are the number of occupational programs nationally. Add in a national high school dropout rate of 11 percent - and as high as 50 percent in some urban areas - and the net result is that the majority of American high school students approach adulthood without the skills to sustain themselves economically or succeed in postsecondary education. (See Section 2 of the School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994.)
Meanwhile, even as the world's best companies are redesigning themselves to increase productivity, quality, variety, and speed, most American businesses are still organized around the mass production economy of the early 1900s (Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce, 1990). Too many American companies do not make the investments in human resources and training needed for a high-performance workplace.
Clearly, while improving education is not the only answer to the country's economic problems, the education system needs to be restructured to prepare students for success in the workplace and postsecondary education. The federal government is attempting to stimulate such restructuring with the School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994. The law funds activities in three arenas: school-based learning, work-based learning, and connecting activities. A core theme of the Act is the need to integrate academic and vocational learning, school-based and work-based learning, and secondary and postsecondary education.
The Act cites tech prep, youth apprenticeship , career academies, and cooperative education as "promising" school-to-work activities. Local partnerships can design systems that meet their local needs through school-based learning, work-based learning, and connecting activities.
Joe D'Amico and Ed Janus, hosts of NCREL's Rural Audio Journals,
speak about how school-to-work efforts strive to help students see the
connection between work and learning. Excerpted from NCREL's Rural
Audio Journal, Vol. 2, No. 3, From School to Work - and Back Again:
Youth Apprenticeships in Wisconsin (NCREL, 1994) (Audio comment, 387k). A text version is available.
GOALS: The Act has 14
stated purposes the first purpose being to establish a national
framework to enable the creation of statewide school-to-work
opportunities systems that are part of comprehensive educational
reform efforts. These systems must offer opportunities
for all students to earn portable credentials; prepare students
for first jobs in high-skill, high-wage careers; and increase students'
opportunities for further education, including education in a four-year
college or university. These goals should be accomplished through performance-based
education and training programs and integrated into systems developed under
the National
Skill Standards Act of 1994 (Title V of the Goals
2000: Educate America Act), which establishes a National
Skills Standards Board.
Joe D'Amico, one of the hosts of NCREL's Rural Audio Journals, talks
about how the confidence that students gain through successful apprenticeship
experiences allows them to go farther in their education. Excerpted
from NCREL's Rural Audio Journal, Vol. 2, No. 3, From School
to Work - and Back Again: Youth Apprenticeships in Wisconsin (NCREL,
1994) (Audio comment, 360k). A text version is available.
ACTION OPTIONS: The Center on Education and Work, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, has developed A Leadership Model for Planning and Implementing
Change for School-to-Work Transition (Paris, 1994). This collaborative
planning model incorporates aspects of the "plan-do-study-act"
process used for continuous improvement in organizations practicing total
quality management (TQM). Teachers, administrators, counselors, parents,
students, postsecondary representatives, business, industry, labor, and
community representatives work in partnership to plan and implement systems
that will improve school-to-work transition for all students. The model
identifies six strategies for improving school-to-work transition for all
students:
IMPLEMENTATION PITFALLS: Schools tend to make plans and then try to
"sell" those plans to the rest of the community. It is extremely
important for key stakeholders to be involved in collaborative planning
from the beginning of the process to ensure that the entire school community
is committed to the implementation of school-to-work transition plans.
Other pitfalls include making major changes too quickly without adequate professional development or communication; creating work-based learning programs based on convenience rather than labor market need; and designing and implementing programs that do not meet the needs of a diverse population of students.
DIFFERENT POINTS OF VIEW: Some view the school-to-work movement and
tech prep, which preceded it, as systems for tracking low-income and minority
students into vocational programs:
"Despite the claims of its advocates, [youth apprenticeship] will not equalize educational opportunities or improve the economic prospects of poor and minority youth; it will only reproduce the inequities that apprenticeship claims to address." (Kantor, 1993)
While school-to-work supporters are confident that business, industry, and labor will participate in school-to-work programs, opponents fear that there is little incentive for them to do so.
ILLUSTRATIVE CASES:
Kalamazoo County's Education for Employment
Craftmanship 2000 youth apprenticeship programs include work-based and school-based learning and connecting activities.
CONTACTS:
Center on Education and Work
University of Wisconsin at Madison
Educational Sciences Building
1025 W. Johnson St., Room 964
Madison, WI 53706-1796
608-263-2714; fax 608-262-9197
Contact: Dr. L. Allen Phelps
WWW: http://www.cew.wisc.edu
National Center for Research in Vocational Education
Materials Distribution Service
Western Illinois University
1 University Circle
Macomb, IL 61455-1390
Contact: Diana Burnell
(800) 637-7652, FAX: (309) 298-2869
e-mail: mimds@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
WWW: http://www.wiu.edu/users/micpc/index.html
Jobs for the Future
One Bowdoin Square, 11th Floor
Boston, MA 02114
617-742-5995
Contact: Mary Ellen Bavaro, Director of Communications
FAX: 617-742-5767
e-mail: meBavaro@jff.org
This Critical Issue was researched and written by Kathleen Paris, Director, Leadership Institute for School-to-Work Transition, Center on Education and Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Date posted: 1995